Janice R. Andrews
The Starbucks workers’ strike, led by the Starbucks Workers United union, is rapidly expanding. Initially starting in Los Angeles, Chicago, and Seattle, the five-day strike has now spread to cities including Boston, Pittsburgh, New York, Dallas, Denver, and Portland, Oregon, shutting down nearly 60 stores across the U.S.
The protests stem from unresolved contract disputes and allegations of unfair labor practices. The union claims that Starbucks has failed to fulfill its February promise to finalize a contract with employees by the end of the year. Additionally, hundreds of legal complaints about unfair labor practices have been filed with the National Labor Relations Board.
Negotiations between Starbucks and the union have been ongoing since spring, but the two sides have been unable to reach an agreement on financial terms. While Starbucks proposed a 1.5% minimum annual pay increase for union workers, the union has rejected the offer, demanding an immediate pay raise. Starbucks, on the other hand, maintains that its compensation packages are competitive, with baristas in the U.S. earning an average of $18 per hour, plus benefits such as health coverage and free college tuition, bringing total compensation to about $30 per hour.
Although Starbucks claims the strikes have not significantly disrupted operations, the timing of the walkouts—during the crucial holiday season—could affect the company’s financial performance.
Employees argue their demands are justified, especially in light of the projected $100 million salary for new CEO Brian Niccol in his first year.
The strike’s expansion highlights growing frustration among Starbucks workers, who are pushing for better pay and working conditions despite the company’s record profits. If the strike continues to spread, it could lead to even greater disruption for the coffee giant.
This action is part of a broader shift in the U.S. labor market, where workers are increasingly standing up for better wages and working conditions.
