The United Nations’ COP16 biodiversity conference in Cali, Colombia, ended in a stalemate over crucial funding decisions, despite extended negotiations. Nearly 200 nations participated in talks that ran 12 hours over schedule, yet failed to establish concrete financial commitments needed to support the Kunming-Montreal Global Diversity Framework’s 2030 environmental goals.
The conference exposed persistent tensions between developed and developing nations over conservation financing. While advanced economies had previously committed to providing $20 billion annually by 2025, increasing to $30 billion by 2030, disagreements over fund distribution and accountability mechanisms prevented a final agreement. Summit president Susana Muhamad ultimately suspended proceedings as delegates began departing.
Despite the funding impasse, the summit achieved two notable breakthroughs. The first was the establishment of a permanent consultative body for Indigenous peoples, enhancing their role in global environmental decision-making. Chilean Indigenous representative Camila Romero hailed this as a historic development in environmental governance.
The second achievement was the creation of a profit-sharing mechanism for genetic resources. This arrangement ensures that when genetic data from plants and animals leads to commercial products, 50% of the profits will flow back to Indigenous communities and local populations in the regions where these resources originate. This system particularly benefits biodiversity-rich areas in developing nations, whose genetic resources contribute to pharmaceutical and agricultural advances.
While these accomplishments represent meaningful progress in biodiversity protection, the summit’s inability to secure a comprehensive funding agreement raises concerns about meeting global conservation targets by 2030.