Janice R. Andrews
Friedrich Merz, leader of Germany’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and a leading candidate for chancellor, has stirred controversy with a proposal to reinstate permanent border controls. Announced on Monday, the legislation aims to strengthen Germany’s borders with increased police presence, a move that challenges EU immigration norms established under the Schengen Agreement.
A High-Stakes Proposal
Merz plans to present the legislation in parliament on Wednesday, drawing sharp criticism for his willingness to pass the bill with support from the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) if necessary. The AfD, known for its anti-immigration stance, is under surveillance for anti-democratic activities, raising concerns about breaching Germany’s political “firewall” against cooperation with far-right parties.
“Neither the SPD nor the Greens, and certainly not the AfD, will dictate what laws we introduce in parliament,” Merz asserted during a press conference, shifting responsibility to the Social Democrats (SPD) and Greens to block the bill if they oppose it. “It’s on them to prevent majorities none of us want,” he added.
Rationale and Repercussions
Merz justified the proposal by citing a recent knife attack by an Afghan asylum seeker whose deportation had been delayed. “There are 40,000 asylum applicants who should be deported. These are ticking time bombs in our communities,” he argued, criticizing the current government and former Chancellor Angela Merkel for being too lenient on immigration.
The proposal drew swift condemnation from German politicians and EU partners. Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock of the Green Party called the plan anti-European and unworkable, warning, “If we start doing this, Europe will collapse.” Austrian Chancellor Alexander Schallenberg also raised concerns, emphasizing the importance of adhering to Schengen rules while revisiting migration policies.
Practical Challenges
Merz’s plan faces significant logistical obstacles. Andreas Rosskopf, head of the German Police Union (GdP), estimated that implementing the proposal would require 8,000 to 10,000 additional officers. Currently, only about 1,000 riot police are deployed at borders, making such a scale-up a daunting task.
Rosskopf also noted that Germany lacks sufficient modern surveillance tools, such as drones and license plate scanners, which would be essential for effectively monitoring borders.
Conflict with EU Policies
Merz’s proposal directly opposes the Schengen Agreement, which allows free movement within EU member states. Any substantial deviation, such as suspending asylum rights under Article 72 of the EU Treaty, would likely face legal challenges at the European Court of Justice.
The plan includes denying entry to migrants attempting to cross into Germany from other Schengen countries. This raises legal and practical questions, such as determining where individuals first entered the EU and how to reconcile such measures with international asylum obligations.
A Strategic Shift in Politics
Merz’s approach signals a noticeable shift to the right for the CDU, which had previously taken a more moderate stance on immigration under Angela Merkel’s leadership. With federal elections set for February 23, Merz’s hardline proposal appears to target voters concerned about irregular migration and recent violent incidents involving migrants.
Current polling shows the CDU leading with 31%, followed by the AfD at 20%. The SPD and Greens lag behind at 15% and 14%, respectively. By courting voters disillusioned with mainstream parties, Merz risks alienating moderates while potentially strengthening far-right influence in German politics.
Implications for Germany and Europe
The proposal’s potential passage with AfD support could fracture Germany’s longstanding commitment to isolating far-right parties, setting a controversial precedent. Critics warn that such a move could legitimize the AfD and weaken Germany’s democratic norms.
As Europe faces mounting migration challenges, Merz’s initiative highlights the tension between national security priorities and international commitments. The outcome will not only shape Germany’s immigration policy but also influence broader European strategies for border management and asylum rights.
Conclusion
Friedrich Merz’s proposal to tighten Germany’s borders has sparked fierce debate about immigration policy and the nation’s adherence to EU principles. While addressing growing public concerns about security, the plan risks damaging Germany’s international relationships and undermining its political traditions. With federal elections approaching, Merz’s controversial stance will test his leadership and Germany’s democratic resilience.
